Universal Design for Learning (UDL)
Accessibility in your course means that all learners have equal access to learning, with particular attention to students with physical and cognitive disabilities. Universal Design for Learning (sometimes known as Universal Instructional Design) is a framework for designing courses that removes barriers to learning wherever possible, and that moves beyond physical concerns to consider all aspects of the learning environment. Academic accommodations and extenuating circumstances requests intersect with both accessibility and UDL.
Sections:
Campus Supports
The 皇冠体育鈥檚 Accessibility Hub has information for educators. Their site features numerous 鈥榟ow-to鈥 guides for making instructor communications with students more accessible, whether in the form of documents, slide presentations, videos, emails, and other formats.
The Accessibility Hub suggests four key changes to enhance accessibility:
- consider font choice (sans serif, no italics or shadowing)
- describe non-text elements (charts, tables, logos, etc.)
- caption audio and video, and provide a transcript
- test for accessibility
Universal Design for Learning (UDL) is a framework that aims to improve and optimize teaching and learning for all by providing students with multiple means of representation, expression, and engagement. When done well, UDL has the ability to provide flexibility, allowing all students the ability to connect their unique ways of understanding and learning to the essential requirements of the class, course, and program of study.
皇冠体育鈥檚 Student Accessibility Services supports and encourages the implementation of UDL that:
- Promotes instructors鈥 pedagogical creativity and exploration. Allows for multiple ways of representing the essential material of a class, course, and/or program of study
- Recognizes each student鈥檚 unique way of understanding. Allows students to engage with essential material in multiple ways
- Highlights each student鈥檚 unique strengths. Allows students to express and demonstrate independent learning in multiple ways
In supporting and encouraging the usage of UDL, 皇冠体育鈥檚 Student Accessibility Services acknowledges that:
- UDL is integrated and foundational. UDL must be integrated into the curriculum planning from the start to ensure it is foundational to course development rather than additive
- UDL is active and ongoing. UDL must be actively and continually implemented into classrooms. UDL is an ongoing process of engagement, creativity, and reflexivity
- UDL and accommodations are both important, necessary, and required. While UDL does improve accessibility, it does not remove all barriers to access for which students with disabilities may seek accommodations. UDL does not remove the necessity to accommodate students.
Ventus connects students with accommodations, instructors, 皇冠体育鈥檚 Student Accessibility Services, and the Exams Office in the process to request, assess, and implement academic accommodations. If you are listed as the instructor of record in PeopleSoft, you should have access to your course in Ventus.
Login:
Documentation and videos:
Need Access? Instructors of record can authorize access to their Ventus class by submitting a request to:
Need help? The Centre for Teaching and Learning is providing support for instructors in their use of Ventus.
- Submit a
- Send a Microsoft Teams message to Karla Coleman or Selina Idlas
- For urgent issues call: 613-533-6428
UDL Basics
Universal Design for Learning (UDL) is an educational framework that helps to guide the creation of materials, methods, and assessments for diverse learners, recognizing that 鈥渧ariability [among learners] is the rule, not the exception鈥 (David Rose, from the organization).
With UDL, instructors can work to remove barriers to education and empower students by building in options that allow for increased student autonomy, choice, and motivation.
It is important to recognize that despite its name, UDL can never be truly universal, and students will always have needs for accommodations that expand beyond adjustments you may make to your course using the principles of UDL. This is not a failure of your work or of UDL, but a recognition that, like everything else in education, one model cannot encapsulate the whole of human diversity.
UDL should therefore be thought of as a tool in one鈥檚 educational toolbox, best implemented with a 鈥測es, and鈥 OR mindset, rather than an 鈥渆ither or鈥 approach. The principles of UDL are something to supplement accommodation processes and imbue accessibility into courses, rather than to replace accommodations altogether. It may be helpful to focus on the word 鈥渄esign鈥 in the acronym, to see UDL as an active 鈥渨ay to plan, to foresee, to imagine the future.鈥 (Dolmage, 2017, p.119).
The information and resources offered below provide an overview of the key tenets of UDL using 鈥榩lus one鈥 thinking to give you simple ways to slowly make your course more accessible.
Three Principles of UDL
1. Multiple means of representation
This principle asks you to present and share information in varied ways with your students to address the WHAT of learning.
Learners differ in the ways that they perceive and comprehend the information presented to them. Factors such as sensory or learning disabilities, language barriers, or cultural differences may impact the ways and speed at which students approach content. Ways to present information or to make the information you鈥檙e presenting more accessible might include:
- Providing information on key concepts in multiple mediums (e.g., text and video; podcast and reading)
- Captioning videos
- Making sure your PDFs are accessible using or Ally
- Providing Word docs instead of PDFs where possible
- Ensuring that your onQ page is accessible
- Planning ahead to make sure content is available in the necessary accessible formats.
- Including Alt-Text for all graphs and images
- Assigning books that have an audiobook option available
- Including graphics alongside text explanations
- Providing transcripts of lectures
- Using accessible slides for lectures/tutorials/seminars and giving access to slides ahead of time
2. Multiple means of action and expression
This principle asks you to have a variety of ways for students to demonstrate their knowledge and express what they know to address the HOW of learning.
Learners differ the ways that they navigate learning environments, both online and in person, as well as how they express what they know. Disabilities, language barriers, cultural preferences, executive function capacity, and family knowledge of the university system will all impact how students exist in the educational environment. There is not one way to express learning that will suit all learners at all times. Ways that students can show you they are achieving learning outcomes may include:
- Active learning/participate and write about the experience
- A research paper/lab report/analysis
- A narrative piece, positionality reflection, or poem
- Discussion in class, over email, onQ discussion forums, or meeting in person
- A podcast or video
- Concept maps or infographics
- Annotated bibliographies
- An alternate syllabus or reading list for the course
- Written, open-book, asynchronous, unproctored final exams
- In-person or virtual oral exams
- A student-led/chosen art project of another medium
- Other kinds of either
If your course includes participation grades, aim to provide a variety of ways for students to participate that are equally valued, rather than prioritizing speaking-up in class. Discussion boards, weekly reading reflections, and/or small group work can be less intimidating for some students.
An accessibility checklist for some of these can be found on the CTL website.
3. Multiple means of engagement
This principle asks you to use a variety of activities, interactions, and resources for students to engage with to address the WHY of learning.
Learners differ in how they view learning and success, as well as how they can be engaged or motivated to learn. Cultural values, background knowledge, familial expectations, personal relevance, and other factors can all impact how students look to engage in the course material. Some ways that students engage with the course might include:
- Active learning techniques
- Reading and reflecting
- Guided group work
- Small group or breakout group work
- Think, Pair, Share
- Teaching each other
- Creating things (dioramas, maps, etc.)
- Discussions (in person, through forums)
- Chunked lectures
Regardless of method, the important thing to remember is that every student will be motivated to succeed in the course by different things, and their definition of success might look radically different from your own, or the student next to them. Asking students to identify their own goals in the course and encouraging them in their individual pursuits will help to foster collaboration, and sustain effort and persistence.
So, Where Do I Start?
The three principles of UDL have been developed out by CAST into further guidelines and checkpoints. The UDL anti-checklist further outlines these three principles and simple, actionable steps you can take to implement them in your classroom.
Other great places to start include re-evaluating your syllabus and course policies, exploring how language impacts the accessibility of your classroom, and looking into alternative assignments or ungrading.
Further Reading and Resources:
- (皇冠体育鈥檚 CTL and QSAS)
- (University of Calgary)
- Accessible Instruction for Educators training (皇冠体育鈥檚 HREO)
- Examples of UDL in practice (皇冠体育鈥檚 CTL)
- (University of Calgary)
- to guide conceptual UDL discussions (Camosun College)
Dolmage, J. T. (2017). Academic Ableism: Disability and Higher Education. University of Michigan Press.
Katz, J. (2015). Implementing the Three Block Model of Universal Design for Learning: Effects on teachers鈥 self-efficacy, stress, and job satisfaction in inclusive classrooms K-12. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 19(1), 1鈥20.
Kieran, L., & Anderson, C. (2019). Connecting Universal Design for Learning With Culturally Responsive Teaching. Education and Urban Society, 51(9), 1202鈥1216.
Meyer, Rose, D. H., Gordon, D. T., & Rose, D. H. (2014). Universal Design for Learning: Theory and Practice. CAST Professional Publishing, an imprint of CAST, Inc.
O鈥橬eill, J. L. (2021). Accessibility for All Abilities: How Universal Design, Universal Design for Learning, and Inclusive Design Combat Inaccessibility and Ableism. 9(1), 1鈥15.
Walters, S. (2010). Toward an Accessible Pedagogy: Dis/ability, Multimodality, and Universal Design in the Technical Communication Classroom. Technical Communication Quarterly, 19(4), 427鈥454.
Womack, A.M. (2017). Teaching Is Accommodation: Universally Designing Composition Classrooms and Syllabi. College Composition and Communication, 68(3), 494鈥525.
Accessibility and UDL Misconceptions
鈥淓very act of teaching is an accommodation because it creates certain conditions for students to learn and display learning鈥 (Womack, 2017, p.497).
As with any other new practice or process, learning about and starting to use UDL can be intimidating, overwhelming, and come with built in biases and misgivings. With UDL these misgivings can be compounded by ableist narratives built into the very foundation of the educational system, narratives that can be hard to identify at first glance. Some of these concerns include:
- That disabled students are trying to take advantage of the system or use accommodations that they could do without
- That students with accommodations have an unfair advantage
- That freely providing accommodations or using UDL will lower course standards
While prominent narratives in the university, these concerns are unfounded, with research showing that the opposite is true.
- It is estimated that only half of disabled students disclose their disabilities and many forego accommodations that they need to succeed in order to avoid stigma
- Students with accommodations face considerable social and academic stigma
- Building access and UDL into your course increases the capacity for students to learn and display their learning in meaningful ways, allowing for deeper connections across course content
Using UDL is a way to invite students into conversation with the course material in ways that are accessible, equitable, and meaningful for them. Building access into your course is beneficial to all students, but especially disabled students who are unable to jump through the bureaucratic hoops to receive formal accommodations due to lack of information, insufficient healthcare access, financial barriers, medical racism, or other factors. UDL is also a way to expand beyond impairment-specific accommodations that may neglect other invisible disabilities, socio-cultural factors, or personal circumstances.
UDL is not a substitute for formal accommodations or academic consideration, but a tool to be used alongside them, extending access, care, and meaningful education beyond the bounds of paperwork. It moves accommodation from just a formal process to the most basic act of teaching, where adaptations are continually made to support learning.
So, What is UDL?
UDL is:
- A process, a means rather than an end
- A verb, not a noun
- A way to promote student autonomy and transform passivity into engagement
- Valuable for all students, but centers disabled students, especially multiple marginalized disabled students
- Based in the recognition of difference and individual learning journeys
- Proactive
UDL is not:
- A replacement for accommodations or academic considerations
- A watering down of course content
- A practice that compromises rigor
- A one-size-fits-all solution or checklist approach
- Universal
- Reactive
鈥淚nclusion and rigor are only incompatible when rigor is defined as exclusion and inflexibility. When rigor is defined as difficulty, they are complementary values鈥 (Womack, 2017, p.497). Ultimately, the way to teach difficult material well is to make it more accessible. In this vein of thinking, UDL encourages you to examine 鈥減inch points鈥 in your course鈥攑laces where students consistently ask for accommodations, get confused, or require ongoing clarification. Pinch points often signal spaces where UDL might be implemented.
When you come across a pinch point:
- Ask whether the task or content at hand be achieved/learned/engaged in a different way with the same learning outcome
- Notice what judgements around your students or your own teaching come up in this reflection process
- Are any of the judgements you鈥檙e passing based on the assumption that you or your students should be learning or teaching in specific ways?
- Where did you learn that this is the way it 鈥渟hould鈥 be done? Does that still hold value for you or your students?
- If there is another more accessible way to meet the same goal that aligns better with your teaching values, do it! If you can鈥檛 change the pinch point entirely:
- Extend the time for the point, either reviewing material or providing extended deadlines.
- Offer supplementary material in a variety of mediums so that even if you can鈥檛 address the content in class in a different way, options are available.
- Consider whether you can add just one more way for the task to be learned/engaged/assessed by using this UDL anti-checklist.
Implementing UDL can require you to confront internal biases and reflect on your work, but it is important to remember that simple changes can make a big difference. You do not need to change everything all at once, but rather you can choose a few suggested strategies and build on your successes. A great place to begin is in thinking about the language and rhetoric you use in the classroom and how it sets the tone for your work.